![]() IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1998, 34(1):329–334. Manolakis DE, Cox ME: Effect in range difference position estimation due to stations' position errors. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1996, 32(4):1239–1248. Manolakis DE: Efficient solution and performance analysis of 3-D position estimation by trilateration. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 2001, 17(1):91–94. Mahajan A, Walworth M: 3D position sensing using the differences in the time-of-flights from a wave source to various receivers. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC '99), October 1999, Tokyo, Japan 4: 737–741. Ghidary SS, Tani T, Takamori T, Hattori M: A new home robot positioning system (HRPS) using IR switched multi ultrasonic sensors. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1976, 12: 187–193. ![]() Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems (WISES '05), May 2005, Hamburg, Germany 79–88.įoy WH: Position-location solutions by taylor-series estimation. Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '99), September 1999, New Orleans, La, USA 1: 316–320.Ĭasas R, Gracia HJ, Marco A, Falcó JL: Synchronization in wireless sensor networks using Bluetooth. Proceedings of IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '02), 2002, Birmingham, Ala, USA 2: 856–860.Ĭhen P-C: A non-line-of-sight error mitigation algorithm in location estimation. Venkatraman S, Caffery Jr J, You H-R: Location using LOS range estimation in NLOS environments. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, October 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 1: 296–300. Venkatraman S, Caffery J Jr.: Statistical approach to non-line-of-sight BS identification. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies, March 2001, London, UK 134–138. Kim W, Jee G-I, Lee J: Wireless location with NLOS error mitigation in Korean CDMA system. ![]() Proceedings of 53rd IEEE Semi-Annual Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '01), May 2001, Rhodes, Greece 1: 387–391. Povescu I, Nafomita I, Constantinou P, Kanatas A, Moraitis N: Neural networks applications for the prediction of propagation pathloss in urban environments. Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCS '03), May 2003, Providence, RI, USA 480–483. Proceedings of 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM '00), March 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel 2: 775–784.Īnastasi G, Bandelloni R, Conti M, Delmastro F, Gregori E, Mainetto G: Experimenting an indoor bluetooth-based positioning service. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA 1996.īahl P, Padmanabhan VN: RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. 10.1109/35.983917īorestein J, Everett HR, Feng L: Where Am I? Sensors and Methods for Mobile Robot Positioning. Pahlavan K, Li X, Makela JP: Indoor geolocation science and technology. Federal Communications Commission Reports and Orders 96–264 1996. 2002.ĭocket CC: Revision of the commission rule to ensure compatibility with enhanced 911 emergency calling system. We obtained remarkable results when using it in a real indoor positioning system that works with Bluetooth and ultrasound (BLUPS), even when nearly half the measures suffered from NLOS or other coarse errors.Įuropean Commission : Directive 2002/58/EC on Privacy and Electronic Communications. We show how the least-median-of-squares technique can be used to overcome the effects of NLOS errors, even in environments with little infrastructure, and validate its suitability by comparing it to other methods described in the bibliography. In this paper, we describe the use of robust regression techniques to detect and reject NLOS measures in a location estimation using multilateration. Though many ad hoc techniques have been developed to deal with this problem, unfortunately most of them are not applicable indoors due to the high variability of the environment (movement of furniture and of people, etc.). Like outdoor systems, they suffer from non-line-of-sight (NLOS) errors which hinder their robustness and accuracy. Indoor localization systems are undoubtedly of interest in many application fields.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |